<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <ArticleSet> <Article> <Journal> <PublisherName>thejupd</PublisherName> <JournalTitle>Journal of Updates in Pediatric Dentistry</JournalTitle> <PISSN>I</PISSN> <EISSN>S</EISSN> <Volume-Issue>Volume 1 Issue 2</Volume-Issue> <PartNumber/> <IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic> <IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage> <Season>Volume 1, Issue 2, July - December 2022</Season> <SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue> <SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue> <IssueOA>Y</IssueOA> <PubDate> <Year>-0001</Year> <Month>11</Month> <Day>30</Day> </PubDate> <ArticleType>Pediatric Dentistry</ArticleType> <ArticleTitle>Comparative evaluation of malocclusions using digital intraoral photography and conventional examination methods: A tele dentistry approach in orthodontics</ArticleTitle> <SubTitle/> <ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage> <ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA> <FirstPage>22</FirstPage> <LastPage>28</LastPage> <AuthorList> <Author> <FirstName>Yong</FirstName> <LastName>Chen</LastName> <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage> <Affiliation/> <CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor> <ORCID/> <FirstName>Shuyi</FirstName> <LastName>Zhang</LastName> <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage> <Affiliation/> <CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor> <ORCID/> <FirstName>Bai Wang</FirstName> <LastName>Liu</LastName> <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage> <Affiliation/> <CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor> <ORCID/> <FirstName>Shuling</FirstName> <LastName>Guo</LastName> <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage> <Affiliation/> <CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor> <ORCID/> </Author> </AuthorList> <DOI>10.54276/JUPD.2021.1205</DOI> <Abstract>Objective: To analyze the accuracy and duration of oral digital photographs in evaluating malocclusion status and elucidate the feasibility of remote malocclusion diagnosis. Method: Two methods [clinical examinations (CE) combined with the panoramic radiographic assessment, which was conducted as a baseline, and intraoral digital photographs examinations (IDPE), which were taken one month later] were used to evaluate the malocclusion status of 31 college students__ampersandsign#39; volunteers in this onemonth clinical investigation. Malocclusion examinations included: Angel__ampersandsign#39;s classification, overjet, overbite, upper arch space relationship, lower arch space relationship, and examination duration. Result: 29 volunteers completed the whole study. The accuracy of Angel__ampersandsign#39;s classification, overjet, overbite, and upper and lower arch space relationship between CE and IDPE by digital photographs was 72.4%, 79.3%, 100.0%, 89.3%, and 85.7%, respectively. There were moderate consistencies in Angel__ampersandsign#39;s classification and overjet between CE and IDPE (Kappa = 0.46, P < 0.001; Kappa = 0.59, P < 0.001). There were high consistencies in the overbite, upper and lower arch crowding/spacing between CE and IDPE (Kappa = 0.92, P < 0.001; Kappa = 0.69, P < 0.001; Kappa = 0.66, P < 0.001). IDPE duration was less than that of CE (P</Abstract> <AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage> <Keywords>digital photographs, malocclusion, remote diagnosis, orthodontic, accuracy.</Keywords> <URLs> <Abstract>https://thejupd.com/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=14705&title=Comparative evaluation of malocclusions using digital intraoral photography and conventional examination methods: A tele dentistry approach in orthodontics</Abstract> </URLs> <References> <ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle> <ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage> <ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage> <References/> </References> </Journal> </Article> </ArticleSet>