<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>thejupd</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Updates in Pediatric Dentistry</JournalTitle>
      <PISSN>I</PISSN>
      <EISSN>S</EISSN>
      <Volume-Issue>Volume 2 Issue 1</Volume-Issue>
      <PartNumber/>
      <IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic>
      <IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
      <Season>Volume 2, Issue 1, January-June 2023</Season>
      <SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
      <SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
      <IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
      <PubDate>
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>1</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <ArticleType>Pediatric Dentistry</ArticleType>
      <ArticleTitle>Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of Propex PixiTM and CanalProTM electronic apex locators in primary anterior teeth</ArticleTitle>
      <SubTitle/>
      <ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
      <ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
      <FirstPage>44</FirstPage>
      <LastPage>50</LastPage>
      <AuthorList>
        <Author>
          <FirstName>Gaurav</FirstName>
          <LastName>Shukla</LastName>
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
          <FirstName>Dinesh</FirstName>
          <LastName>Rao</LastName>
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
          <FirstName>Sunil</FirstName>
          <LastName>Panwar</LastName>
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
        </Author>
      </AuthorList>
      <DOI>10.54276/JUPD.2023.2107</DOI>
      <Abstract>Aim: To evaluate and compare in vitro, the accuracy of two different electronic apex locators, i.e., Propex PixiTM and CanalProTM in primary anterior teeth.&#13;
&#13;
Methodology: A total of 60 primary teeth sample has been selected using a convenience sampling method. Samples were divided into two experimental groups in which, Group 1 belong to Propex PixiTM apex locator, and Group 2 CanalProTM. The mean values with standard deviations of electronic working length by using Propex PixiTM and CanalProTM with that of stereomicroscopic actual working length were calculated and compared&#13;
&#13;
Results: There was statistically significant difference between values obtained by the two electronic apex locators and actual length Conclusion: A strong correlation was seen between the two electronic methods and AL and also in between the two EALs, showing the possibility of their use to measure the root canal length.</Abstract>
      <AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
      <Keywords>Working length, Electronic apex locators, Actual length, Propex PixiTM, CanalProTM</Keywords>
      <URLs>
        <Abstract>https://thejupd.com/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=14992&amp;title=Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of Propex PixiTM and CanalProTM electronic apex locators in primary anterior teeth</Abstract>
      </URLs>
      <References>
        <ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle>
        <ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage>
        <ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage>
        <References/>
      </References>
    </Journal>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>