<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>thejupd</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>Journal of Updates in Pediatric Dentistry</JournalTitle>
<PISSN>3048-8109 (</PISSN>
<EISSN>)</EISSN>
<Volume-Issue>Volume 1 Issue 2</Volume-Issue>
<PartNumber/>
<IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic>
<IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
<Season>Volume 1, Issue 2, July - December 2022</Season>
<SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
<SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
<IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
<PubDate>
<Year>-0001</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubDate>
<ArticleType>Pediatric Dentistry</ArticleType>
<ArticleTitle>Comparative evaluation of malocclusions using digital intraoral photography and conventional examination methods: A tele dentistry approach in orthodontics</ArticleTitle>
<SubTitle/>
<ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
<ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
<FirstPage>22</FirstPage>
<LastPage>28</LastPage>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>Yong</FirstName>
<LastName>Chen</LastName>
<AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
<Affiliation/>
<CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor>
<ORCID/>
<FirstName>Shuyi</FirstName>
<LastName>Zhang</LastName>
<AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
<Affiliation/>
<CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor>
<ORCID/>
<FirstName>Bai Wang</FirstName>
<LastName>Liu</LastName>
<AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
<Affiliation/>
<CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor>
<ORCID/>
<FirstName>Shuling</FirstName>
<LastName>Guo</LastName>
<AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
<Affiliation/>
<CorrespondingAuthor>Y</CorrespondingAuthor>
<ORCID/>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<DOI>10.54276/JUPD.2021.1205</DOI>
<Abstract>Objective: To analyze the accuracy and duration of oral digital photographs in evaluating malocclusion status and elucidate the feasibility of remote malocclusion diagnosis.
Method: Two methods [clinical examinations (CE) combined with the panoramic radiographic assessment, which was conducted as a baseline, and intraoral digital photographs examinations (IDPE), which were taken one month later] were used to evaluate the malocclusion status of 31 college students__ampersandsign#39; volunteers in this onemonth clinical investigation. Malocclusion examinations included: Angel__ampersandsign#39;s classification, overjet, overbite, upper arch space relationship, lower arch space relationship, and examination duration.
Result: 29 volunteers completed the whole study. The accuracy of Angel__ampersandsign#39;s classification, overjet, overbite, and upper and lower arch space relationship between CE and IDPE by digital photographs was 72.4%, 79.3%, 100.0%, 89.3%, and 85.7%, respectively. There were moderate consistencies in Angel__ampersandsign#39;s classification and overjet between CE and IDPE (Kappa = 0.46, P < 0.001; Kappa = 0.59, P < 0.001). There were high consistencies in the overbite, upper and lower arch crowding/spacing between CE and IDPE (Kappa = 0.92, P < 0.001; Kappa = 0.69, P < 0.001; Kappa = 0.66, P < 0.001). IDPE duration was less than that of CE (P</Abstract>
<AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
<Keywords>digital photographs, malocclusion, remote diagnosis, orthodontic, accuracy.</Keywords>
<URLs>
<Abstract>https://thejupd.com/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=14705&title=Comparative evaluation of malocclusions using digital intraoral photography and conventional examination methods: A tele dentistry approach in orthodontics</Abstract>
</URLs>
<References>
<ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle>
<ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage>
<ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage>
<References/>
</References>
</Journal>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>